Traditional vs. Infrared Saunas: Which Is Right for You?

📅 Updated: October 7, 2024 ⏱️ 13 min read ✍️ Kristen Nicholson
Side by side comparison of traditional wooden sauna and modern infrared sauna technologies

The sauna debate: traditional versus infrared. I've experienced both extensively over the years, and the truth is, they're both excellent—just in different ways. The question isn't which is objectively better, but which better serves your specific goals, lifestyle, and constraints.

After helping hundreds of people choose between these technologies, I've learned that the decision comes down to a few key factors: budget, available space, desired experience, health goals, and how often you'll realistically use it. This comprehensive comparison will help you make the right choice for your unique situation.

Understanding the Fundamental Differences

Traditional Saunas

Traditional saunas have existed for thousands of years, originating in Finland. They work by heating air to high temperatures (150-195°F) using:

Water is poured over hot rocks to create steam, elevating humidity to 10-20%. This combination of high heat and humidity creates the intense, enveloping warmth traditional sauna enthusiasts love. Your skin heats first, then your core temperature gradually rises through conduction.

Infrared Saunas

Infrared saunas are a modern innovation using electromagnetic radiation in the infrared spectrum. Rather than heating air, infrared light directly heats your body tissue. They operate at lower temperatures (120-150°F) because the heating method is fundamentally different:

Think of infrared like sunlight warming you on a cool day—the air might be cold, but you feel warm. This direct heating allows therapeutic benefits at more comfortable ambient temperatures.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Factor Traditional Sauna Infrared Sauna
Temperature 150-195°F 120-150°F
Humidity 10-20% 0-5%
Heat-up time 30-45 minutes 15-20 minutes
Session length 15-20 minutes 30-45 minutes
Power needed 240V, 30-60 amps 120V or 240V, 15-20 amps
Operating cost/hour $1.00-$2.00 $0.30-$0.60
Purchase cost $3,000-$10,000+ $1,500-$5,000
Installation Complex, often professional Simple, usually DIY
Ventilation needs Significant (moisture) Minimal

Health Benefits Comparison

Both sauna types provide proven health benefits, though mechanisms differ slightly:

Cardiovascular Health

Traditional: The extreme heat causes significant cardiovascular stress similar to moderate-intensity exercise. Heart rate increases dramatically (100-150 bpm), providing a cardiovascular workout. Finnish studies show regular traditional sauna use reduces cardiovascular disease risk by up to 50%.

Infrared: Also increases heart rate and improves circulation, though less intensely. The deeper tissue penetration may enhance vascular function through different mechanisms. Research shows similar long-term cardiovascular benefits with regular use.

Winner: Tie—both provide substantial cardiovascular benefits through slightly different pathways.

Detoxification

Traditional: High heat induces profuse sweating, eliminating toxins through the skin. Sweat composition is primarily water with some minerals and trace toxins.

Infrared: Lower ambient temperature but deeper tissue heating may mobilize toxins stored in fat cells more effectively. Some research suggests infrared-induced sweat contains higher concentrations of heavy metals and environmental chemicals.

Winner: Slight edge to infrared for detoxification efficiency, though both are effective.

Pain Relief and Muscle Recovery

Traditional: Surface heating relaxes muscles and temporarily relieves pain. Benefits are real but relatively superficial.

Infrared: Light penetrates 1.5-2 inches into tissue, directly heating muscles, joints, and connective tissue. This deeper heating may provide superior pain relief for chronic conditions like arthritis, fibromyalgia, and sports injuries.

Winner: Infrared for deep tissue healing and chronic pain management.

Respiratory Benefits

Traditional: The combination of heat and humidity benefits respiratory conditions. Steam helps clear congestion, reduce inflammation, and improve lung function. Traditional saunas may help with asthma, bronchitis, and chronic respiratory issues.

Infrared: Dry heat with minimal humidity provides fewer respiratory benefits. Some people with breathing sensitivities actually prefer this.

Winner: Traditional for respiratory health and sinus relief.

Person experiencing benefits of both sauna types showing health improvements

Practical Considerations for Home Use

Installation Complexity

Traditional Sauna Requirements:

Infrared Sauna Requirements:

For home installation, infrared is dramatically simpler and less expensive. Traditional saunas often require $1,000-$3,000 in installation costs beyond the sauna itself.

Operating Costs

Monthly operating costs for regular use (4x weekly, 40-minute sessions):

Traditional Sauna:

Infrared Sauna:

Over a 10-year lifespan, this difference ($50-80 monthly x 120 months) amounts to $6,000-$9,600 in savings with infrared—nearly enough to pay for the sauna itself through energy savings alone.

Maintenance Requirements

Traditional Saunas:

Infrared Saunas:

Infrared saunas require significantly less maintenance, saving both time and money over the unit's lifetime.

The Experience Factor

Beyond practicalities, consider the experience you're seeking:

Traditional Sauna Appeals To:

Infrared Sauna Appeals To:

"I've used both types extensively. Traditional saunas provide an intense, almost spiritual experience that I love occasionally. But for daily wellness practice, infrared wins hands-down. The comfortable temperature lets me session longer, the quick heat-up fits my schedule, and the operating costs don't make me hesitate to use it every day." - Kristen Nicholson

Making Your Decision: Key Questions to Ask

1. What's your primary goal?

2. What's your budget (total cost)?

3. Can you handle complex installation?

4. How often will you use it?

5. What's your heat tolerance?

Hybrid Options: Best of Both Worlds?

Some premium saunas combine both technologies, offering:

These work well for households with mixed preferences or those who want options for different purposes. However, most people find they gravitate toward one mode and rarely use the other, making the premium cost hard to justify.

About the Author

Kristen Nicholson

CEO, Urban Sweat Sauna Studio

After spending 22 years in corporate healthcare, wishing that healthcare was more proactive versus reactive, I was burned out and decided to pivot. I've been obsessed with personal health, working out, and infrared sauna for many years. I use all 3 of our modalities in my daily practice and wanted to show others that we can take our health into our own hands to be proactive to fight disease. Self-care is truly healthcare.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better—they excel in different areas. Traditional saunas provide the classic high-heat experience with humidity, offering authentic cultural tradition and excellent respiratory benefits. Infrared saunas offer deeper tissue penetration, significantly lower operating costs, easier home installation, and more comfortable temperatures for extended sessions. For home use, most people find infrared more practical and cost-effective, but traditional enthusiasts value the intense experience. Your best choice depends on your priorities, budget, and intended use.

Yes, research shows both provide substantial, scientifically-validated health benefits including improved cardiovascular health, enhanced detoxification, pain relief, muscle recovery, stress reduction, and better sleep quality. Infrared may offer advantages for deeper tissue healing and chronic pain due to light penetration depth, while traditional saunas may be superior for respiratory benefits due to humidity. Both types effectively raise core body temperature and induce beneficial physiological responses. The mechanisms differ slightly, but therapeutic outcomes are comparable.

Infrared saunas have multiple practical advantages for home installation: they cost less to purchase ($1,500-$3,000 vs $3,000-$10,000+), require less electrical power (often standard 120V outlets), heat up much faster (15-20 minutes vs 30-45 minutes), cost far less to operate ($0.30-$0.50/hour vs $1-$2/hour), need minimal ventilation with no plumbing or drainage, can be DIY installed in 2-4 hours, and operate at comfortable temperatures making 30-45 minute sessions pleasant. These factors make them more practical and economical for regular home wellness practice.

References and Further Reading

  1. Laukkanen T, et al. Association between sauna bathing and fatal cardiovascular and all-cause mortality events. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2015;175(4):542-548. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25705824
  2. Beever R. Far-infrared saunas for treatment of cardiovascular risk factors. Canadian Family Physician. 2009;55(7):691-696. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2718593/
  3. Hussain J, Cohen M. Clinical effects of regular dry sauna bathing: a systematic review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018.
  4. Mayo Clinic. Are infrared saunas safe? Mayo Clinic Health System. https://www.mayoclinic.org/
  5. Harvard Health Publishing. Saunas and cardiovascular health. Harvard Medical School. https://www.health.harvard.edu/